Citizen Science in Österreich
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31263/voebm.v72i2.2836Schlagworte:
Bürger*innenbeteiligung, Open Science, Netzwerk, Citizen Science, ÖsterreichAbstract
Citizen Science, die aktive Einbeziehung von Laien ohne akademische Ausbildung in den wissenschaftlichen Prozess, hat in den letzten Jahren eine massive Zunahme im Rahmen akademischer Disziplinen und Projekten erfahren. Diese aktive Beteiligung kann auf viele verschiedene Arten gestaltet werden, die oft projekt- und kontextspezifisch sind. Die Popularität der Citizen Science geht Hand in Hand mit der Diskussion über Open Science, und tatsächlich sind beide Konzepte in vielerlei Hinsicht eng miteinander verbunden. Während in der offenen Wissenschaft Laien nicht unbedingt in ein Projekt einbezogen werden müssen, nutzt die Bürger*innenwissenschaft häufig Methoden und Werkzeuge der offenen Wissenschaft, um diese aktive Einbeziehung zu ermöglichen. In diesem Text geben wir eine kurze Einführung in die Citizen Science, ihre Verbindungen zur Open Science und die Entwicklungen der Citizen Science in Österreich in den letzten Jahren und in der Zukunft.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Eitzel, M.V.; Cappadonna, J.L.; Santos-Lang, C.; Duerr, R.E.; Virapongse, A.; West, S.E.; Kyba, C.C.M.; Bowser, A.; Cooper, C.B.; Sforzi, A.; Metcalfe, A.N.; Harris, E.S.; Thiel, M.; Haklay, M.; Ponciano, L.; Roche, J.; Ceccaroni, L.; Shilling, F.M.; Dörler, D.; Heigl, F.; Kiessling, T.; Davis, B.Y. and Jiang, Q. (2017). Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2(1), 1–20. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96
Haklay M. (2013). Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation. In: Sui D., Elwood S., Goodchild M. (eds). Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Springer, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
Sanz, F.S.; Holocher-Ertl, T.; Kieslinger, B.; García, F.S.; Silva, C.G. (2014). White Paper on Citizen Science for Europe; Socientize Consortium. http://www.socientize.eu/sites/default/files/white-paper_0.pdf
Heigl, F.; Kieslinger, B.; Paul, K.T.; Uhlik, J.; Dörler, D. (2019). Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(17), 8089–8092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903393116
Wiggins, A.; Crowston, K. (2011). From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In: Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
DITOs consortium (2017). Citizen Science & Open Science: Synergies & Future Areas of Work. Policy brief 3. https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/sites/default/files/ditos-policybrief3-20180208-citizen_science_and_open_science_synergies_and_future_areas_of_work.pdf
Nosek, B.A.; Alter, G.; Banks, G.C.; Borsboom, D.; Bowman, S.D.; Breckler, S.J.; Buck, S.; Chambers, C.D.; Chin, G.; Christensen, G. et al. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
Richter, A.; Dörler, D.; Hecker, S.; Heigl, F.; Pettibone, L.; Bonn, A. (2018). Capacity building in citizen science. In: Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy; UCL Press: London, UK, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339
Bonney, R. (1996). Citizen science: A lab tradition. Living Bird: For the Study and Conservation of Birds 15(4), 7–15.
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development; Routledge Chapman & Hall.
Dickinson, J.L.; Zuckerberg, B.; Bonter, D.N.(2010). Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
Dickinson, J.L.; Bonney, R. (2012). Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research; Cornell University Press.
Lepczyk, C.A.; Boyle, O.D.; Vargo, T.L.; Gould, P.; Jordan, R.; Liebenberg, L.; Masi, S.; Mueller, W.P.; Prysby, M.D.; Vaughan, H. (2009). Symposium 18: Citizen Science in Ecology: the Intersection of Research and Education. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 90(3), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-90.3.308
Miller-Rushing, A.; Primack, R.; Bonney, R. (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1890/110278
Heiss, R.; Matthes, J. (2017). Citizen Science in the Social Sciences: A Call for More Evidence. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 26(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.7
Paul, K.T. (2018). Collective organization of discourse expertise using information technology – CODE IT! it - Information Technology 60(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2017-0022
Brauer, M. (2018). Opportunities and limitations of citizen science in the humanities. In: Proceedings of the Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2018 – Generation Citizen Science; Frontiers Media SA: Lausanne; 13–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-587-4
Carletti, L.; Giannachi, G.; Price, D.; McAuley, D.; Benford, S. (2013). Digital humanities and crowdsourcing: an exploration. In: Museums and the Web 2013, N. Proctor & R. Cherry (eds). Silver Spring, MD: Museums and the Web. https://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/digital-humanities-and-crowdsourcing-an-exploration-4/
Kasperowski, D.; Hillman, T. (2018). The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects. Social Studies of Science 48(4), 564–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718778806
Robinson, L.D.; Cawthray, J.L.; West, S.E.; Bonn, A.; Ansine, J. (2018). Ten principles of citizen science. Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy; UCL Press: London, UK, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339
Heigl, F.; Dörler, D.; Bartar, P.; Brodschneider, R.; Cieslinski, M.; Ernst, M.; Fritz, S.; Greilhuber, I.; Hatlauf, J.; Hecker, S. et al. Quality Criteria for Citizen Science Projects on Österreich forscht | Version 1.1. Open Science Framework 2018. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/48j27
Clary, E.G.; Snyder, M. (1999). The Motivations to Volunteer: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8(5), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00037
Vicente-Saez, R.; Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
Wilkinson, M.D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, Ij.J.; Appleton, G.; Axton, M.; Baak, A.; Blomberg, N.; Boiten, J.-W.; da Silva Santos, L.B.; Bourne, P.E. et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Dörler, D.; Heigl, F. (2018). Recent Developments in the Austrian Citizen Science Landscape. In: Proceedings of the Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2017 – Expanding Horizons; Frontiers Media SA: Lausanne, 5–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-367-2
Heigl, F., Dörler, D., Weigelhofer, G., Hein, T., Zaller, J.G. (Eds.) (2016). Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2016: Citizen Science – Quo vadis?; Frontiers Media SA: Lausanne, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-005-3
Heigl, F., Dörler, D., Ernst, M. (Eds.) (2018). Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2018; Frontiers Media SA: Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-587-4
Dörler, D.; Heigl, F.; Taru, S. (Eds.) (2018). Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2017 – Expanding Horizons; Frontiers Media SA: Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-367-2
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2019 Daniel Dörler, Florian Heigl
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
Alle Inhalte dieser Zeitschrift – exkl. einzelner Logos und Abbildungen – sind lizenziert unter CC BY 4.0.
