Auf dem Weg zu einer offenen Archäologie: Projekte, Chancen und Herausforderungen

  • Edeltraud Aspöck Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Institut für Orientalische und Europäische Archäologie (OREA) & Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities (ACDH) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-2316
Schlagworte: Archäologie, FAIR, ARIADNE, ARIADNEplus, Open Data, Open Methodology, Open Access, Open Source, Hindernisse für Open Science

Abstract

Im Allgemeinen haben Open Science-Praktiken nur langsam Auswirkungen auf die gängige archäologische Praxis. Eine Ausnahme bildet der offene Zugang zu Publikationen, der – zusammen mit offenen Daten und Methoden – zu den für Archäolog*innen wahrscheinlich wichtigsten offenen Praktiken zählt. Dieser Artikel stellt eine Auswahl von Archäologieprojekten vor, die offene wissenschaftliche Praktiken anwenden und fördern. Schließlich wird es eine Diskussion über einige der Fragen und Herausforderungen geben, denen sich die Disziplin auf ihrem Weg zu einer Open Archaeology gegenübersieht.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Literaturhinweise

A Puzzle in 4D: https://4dpuzzle.orea.oeaw.ac.at/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

A Puzzle in 4D GitHub: https://github.com/acdh-oeaw/4dpuzzle (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

ADS ‘Archaeology Data Service: https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

Andorfer, P.; Aspöck, E.; Ďurčo, M.; Masur, A.; Zaytseva, K. (2016). The DEFC-App: A Web-based Archaeological Data Management System for ‘Digitizing Early Farming Cultures’. In: Digital Humanities 2016: Conference Abstracts. Kraków: Jagiellonian University & Pedagogical University, 726–728.

ARCHE: https://arche.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/browser/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

ARIADNE portal: http://portal.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

ARIADNE services: portal.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/services (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

ARIADNEplus: https://ariadne-infrastructure.eu/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

Aspöck, E. and Geser, G. (2014). What is an archaeological research infrastructure and why do we need it? Aims and challenges of ARIADNE. In: Börner, W. and Uhlirz, S. (eds.). Proceedings of 18th Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies (CHNT) 2013. Vienna: Stadtarchäologie, Museen der Stadt Wien, 1–10. http://www.chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/Aspoeck_Geser_2014.pdf (Last accessed 03 July 2019).

Aspöck, E. and Masur, A. (2015). Digitizing Early Farming Cultures. Customizing the Arches Heritage Inventory and Management System. In: Proceedings of Digital Heritage International Congress 2015, Granada, Spain, 463–464. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7419549

Aspöck, E. and Masur, A. (2014). Archiving archaeological data in Austria (presentation held at the Digital Humanities Austria workshop on digital repositories), Vienna, 2 Dec 2014. https://www.slideshare.net/ariadnenetwork/archiving-archaeological-data-in-austria-edeltraud-aspck-anja-masur-oreaaw (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

Aspöck, E.; Hiebel, G.; Kopetzky, K.; Ďurčo, M. (forthcoming). A puzzle in 4D: Archiving digital and analogue resources of the Austrian excavations at Tell el Daba, Egypt. In: Aspöck, E.; Štuhec, S.; Kopetzky, K. and M. Kucera (eds.). Old excavation data – what can we do? Proccedings from workshop at 10th ICAANE, Vienna April 2015. OREA Series, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Aspöck, E. (forthcoming). Old excavation data – what can we do? An introduction. In: Aspöck, E.; Štuhec, S.; Kopetzky, K. and Kucera, M. (eds.). Old excavation data – what can we do? Proccedings from workshop at 10th ICAANE, Vienna April 2015. OREA Series, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Aspöck, E.; Kopetzky, K.; Horejs, B.; Bietak, M.; Kucera, M. and Neubauer, W. (2015). A puzzle in 4D digital preservation and reconstruction of an Egyptian palace. In: Proceedings of Digital Heritage International Congress 2015, Granada, Spain, 675–678. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7419596

Aspöck, E.; Štuhec, S.; Kopetzky, K. and Kucera, M. (eds.) (forthcoming). Old excavation data – what can we do? Proccedings from workshop at 10th ICAANE, Vienna April 2015. OREA Series, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Beck, A. and Neylon, C. (2012). A vision for Open Archaeology. In: World Archaeology 44(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2012.737581

Bietak, M. (1996). Avaris. The Capital of the Hyksos, London: British Museum Press.

Bosman, J. and Kramer, B. (2017). Defining Open Science Definitions. https://im2punt0.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/defining-open-science-definitions/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

Bundesdenkmalamt (2018). Richtlinien für archäologische Maßnahmen, 5. Fassung, 1. Jänner 2018. https://bda.gv.at/publikationen/standards-leitfaeden-richtlinien/richtlinien-fuer-archaeologische-massnahmen/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

CBAB (Cremation Bronze Age Burials) App: https://cbab.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

Corns, A.; Kennedy, L. and Štular, B. (2014). Impressions from the ARIADNE community: Slovenia and Ireland, Two Perspectives on Archaeology Data. In: ARIADNE. The Way forward to digital archaeology in Europe, 83–89. https://www.slideshare.net/ariadnenetwork/ariadne-the-way-forward-to-digital-archaeology-in-europe (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

DEFC (Digitizing Early Farming Cultures) App: https://defc.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/ (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

DEFC App GitHub: https://github.com/acdh-oeaw/defc-app (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

Doerr, M. (2003): The CIDOC CRM – an Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine 24(3), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v24i3.1720

Ducke, B. (2012). Natives of a connected world: free and open source software in archaeology. In: World Archaeology 44(4), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2012.743259

Edwards, B. and Wilson, A.T. (eds.) (2015a). Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440171

Edwards, B. and Wilson, A.T. (2015b). Open Archaeology: Definitions, Challenges and Context. In: Edwards, B., Andrew T. Wilson (eds.). Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440171-002

FAIR: https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

FOSTER Plus (2019): FOSTER plus (Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond) project, Open Science definition. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-science-definition (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

Frey, J. (forthcoming). The ARCS Project: A “Middle Range” Approach to Digitized Archaeological Record. In: Aspöck, E.; Štuhec, S.; Kopetzky, K. and Kucera, M. (eds.) (forthcoming). Old excavation data – what can we do? Proccedings from workshop at 10th ICAANE, Vienna April 2015. OREA Series, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Hagmann, D. (2018). Überlegungen zur Nutzung von PHAIDRA als Repositorium für digitale archäologische Daten. In: Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare 71(1), 53–69. https://doi.org//10.31263/voebm.v71i1.1974

Huggett, J. (2015). Digital Haystacks: Open Data and the Transformation of Archaeological Knowledge. In: Edwards, B., Andrew T. Wilson (eds.). Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, Berlin: De Gruyter, 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440171-003

Kansa, E. (2012). Openness and archaeology's information ecosystem. In: World Archaeology 44(4), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2012.737575

Kraker, P.; Dörler, D.; Ferus, A.; Gutounig, R.; Heigl, F.; Kaier, C.; Rieck, K.; Šimukovič, E.; Vignoli, M.; Aspöck, E.; Dennerlein, S.; Enkhbayar, A.; McNeill, G.; Schmidt, N.; Steinrisser-Allex, G.; Wandl-Vogt, E. (2016). The Vienna Principles: A Vision for Scholarly Communication in the 21st Century. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.55597

Lake, M. (ed.) (2012). Open Archaeology. World Archaeology 44(4).

Lake, M. (2012). Open Archaeology. In: World Archaeology 44(4), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2012.748521

Marwick, B.; d’Alpoim Guedes, J.; Barton, C. M.; Bates, L. A.; Baxter, M.; Bevan, A.; Bollwerk, E. A.; Bocinsky, R. K.; Brughmans, T.; Carter, A. K.; Conrad, C.; Contreras, D. A.; Costa, S.; Crema, E. R.; Daggett, A.; Davies, B.; Drake, B. L.; Dye, T. S.; France, P.; Fullagar, R.; Giusti, D.; Graham, S.; Harris, M. D.; Hawks, J.; Health, S.; Huffer, D.; Kansa, E. C.; Kansa, S. W.; Madsen, M. E.; Melcher, J.; Negre, J.; Neiman, F. D.; Opitz, R.; Orton, D. C.; Przstupa, P.; Raviele, M.; Riel-Savatore, J.; Riris, P.; Romanowska, I.; Smith, J.; Strupler, N.; Ullah, I. I.; Van Vlack, H. G.; VanValkenburgh, N.; Watrall, E. C.; Webster, C.; Wells, J.; Winters, J. and Wren, C. D. (2017). Open science in archaeology. In: SAA Archaeological Record 17(4), 8–14. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/148887/ (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

Niccolucci, F. and Richards, J.D. (2013). ARIADNE: Advanced Research Infrastructure For Archaeological Dataset Networking in Europe. In: International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 7(1-2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2013.0082

PHAIDRA University of Vienna: https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/ (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

Ray, M. and Richards, J.D. (2015). Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: Open Access, Open Data and Digital Preservation. In: Edwards, B., Andrew T. Wilson (eds.). Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, Berlin: De Gruyter, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440171-004

Richards, J.D. (2017). Twenty Years Preserving Data: A View from the UK. In: Advances in Archaeological Practice 5(special issue 3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2017.11

Schachermeyr, F. (1991). Sammlung Fritz Schachermeyr: Die neolithische Keramik Thessaliens. Aus dem Nachlaß bearbeitet von Eva Alram-Stern, Veröffentlichungen der Mykenischen Kommission 13, Vienna: Academy of Sciences.

SEADDA: https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA18128/#tabs|Name:overview (Last accessed 14 November 2019).

Štuhec, S.; Aspöck, E.; Masur, A.; Andorfer, P. and Zaytseva, K. (2016). Putting 3D models into context. Schachermeyr pottery collection and the DEFC app. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Archaeology, Computer Graphics, Cultural Heritage and Innovation ‘ARQUEOLÓGICA 2.0’ in Valencia, Spain, Sept. 5–7, 2016, 449–451. https://doi.org/10.4995/arqueologica8.2015.4155

Woelfle, M.; Olliaro, P. and Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149

Wright, H. and Richards, J.D. (2018). Reflections on Collaborative Archaeology and Large-Scale Online Research Infrastructures. In: Journal of Field Archaeology 43(supp. 1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2018.1511960

Zaina, F. (forthcoming). Back to the Archive: The Challenge of Old Excavation Data from Ancient Mesopotamia. In: Aspöck, E.; Štuhec, S.; Kopetzky, K. and Kucera, M. (eds.). Old excavation data – what can we do? Proccedings from workshop at 10th ICAANE, Vienna April 2015. OREA Series, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Veröffentlicht
2019-11-21
Zitationsvorschlag
Aspöck, E. (2019) „Auf dem Weg zu einer offenen Archäologie: Projekte, Chancen und Herausforderungen“, Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 72(2), S. 538-554. doi: 10.31263/voebm.v72i2.3249.
Rubrik
Schwerpunktthema