Open Knowledge Maps: Visual Discovery Based on the Principles of Open Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31263/voebm.v72i2.3202Keywords:
Open Science, Discoverability, Literature Search, Knowledge Maps, Visualization, Open Infrastructures, Sustainability, Consortial FundingAbstract
There is a discoverability crisis in research. A significant share of research outputs are not reused, even though publications are more easily accessible thanks to the open access movement. One of the main reasons for the crisis are the tools that we use for discovery. Classic list-based approaches are not suitable any more for the three million papers that are published each year. Open Knowledge Maps is dedicated to improving the visibility of scientific knowledge. To this end, the charitable nonprofit organisation operates the largest visual search engine in the world. Our approach is to use knowledge maps for discovery. Knowledge maps provide an instant overview of a scientific field and thus enable users to get acquainted with the literature much more quickly. Open Knowledge Maps is based on the principles of open science: content, data, and software are shared under an open license. This creates an open infrastructure, avoiding the lock-in effects of proprietary systems. Since the beginning, Open Knowledge Maps has worked together closely with libraries and librarians as the experts for knowledge organisation and management. As part of a consortial funding model, we now invite libraries to co-create the system with us – this includes important upcoming topics, such as the discoverability of research data.
Downloads
References
Börner, Katy, Chaomei Chen, and Kevin W. Boyack (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37(1), 179–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
Brownson, Ross C., Matthew W. Kreuter, Barbara A. Arrington, and William R. True (2006). From the Schools of Public Health’. Public Health Reports 121(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10/gfkr2s
Bornmann, Lutz, and Rüdiger Mutz (2015). Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Number of Publications and Cited References: Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Number of Publications and Cited References. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(11), 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329
Dahn, Bernice, Vera Mussah, and Cameron Nutt. (2015). Opinion | Yes, We Were Warned About Ebola. The New York Times, 7 April, sec. Opinion. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/opinion/yes-we-were-warned-about-ebola.html
Jeschke, Jonathan, Sophie Lokatis, Isabelle Bartram, and Klement Tockner (2019). Knowledge in the Dark: Scientific Challenges and Ways Forward. FACETS 4, 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2019-0007
Johnson, Rob, Anthony Watkinson, and Michael Mabe (2018). The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf
Kraker, Peter, Maxi Schramm, Christopher Kittel, Scott Chamberlain, and Thomas Arrow (2018). VIPER: The Visual Project Explorer. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1248119
Kraker, Peter, Christopher Kittel, and Asura Enkhbayar (2016). Open Knowledge Maps: Creating a Visual Interface to the World’s Scientific Knowledge Based on Natural Language Processing. 027.7 Zeitschrift für Bibliothekskultur / Journal for Library Culture 4(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.12685/027.7-4-2-157
Kraker, Peter, Christopher Kittel, Maxi Schramm, Rainer Bachleitner, Thomas Arrow, Scott Chamberlain, Asura Enkhbayar, et al. (2019). Headstart 5. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2587129
Kraker, Peter (2018). Google Is Capitalizing on a Movement That They Have Contributed Nothing To. Elephant in the Lab (September 27). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1434695
Kraker, Peter, Christian Schlögl, Kris Jack, and Stefanie Lindstaedt (2015). Visualization of Co-Readership Patterns from an Online Reference Management System. Journal of Informetrics 9(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.003 (Author Accepted Manuscript verfügbar unter: https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0348)
Nicolaisen, Jeppe, and Tove Faber Frandsen (2019). Zero Impact: A Large-Scale Study of Uncitedness. Scientometrics 119(2), 1227–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03064-5
Peters, Isabella, Peter Kraker, Elisabeth Lex, Christian Gumpenberger, and Juan Gorraiz (2016). Research Data Explored: An Extended Analysis of Citations and Altmetrics. Scientometrics 107(2), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4
Shneiderman, Ben (1996). The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (Boulder, CO, USA), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307 (Frei zugänglich unter: https://www.cs.umd.edu/~ben/papers/Shneiderman1996eyes.pdf)
“Ebolafieber-Epidemie 2014.” In Wikipedia, May 2, 2019. https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ebolafieber-Epidemie_2014&oldid=188146618
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Peter Kraker, Maxi Schramm, Christopher Kittel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alle Inhalte dieser Zeitschrift – exkl. einzelner Logos und Abbildungen – sind lizenziert unter CC BY 4.0.