Introduction
Ciphering and Ruling Modern China’s Population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25365/jeacs.2025.6.1.ab-scKeywords:
Quantification, Statistics, Modern China, Population, SocietyAbstract
The special issue “Ciphering and Ruling Modern China’s Population” focuses on the increasing efforts to quantify the Chinese population beginning in the twentieth century. The introduction explains how it does not understand numbers as neutral entities reflecting objective facts but as cyphers that encode hidden realities and emerge from concrete historical contexts. Furthermore, it summarises the four contributions to the special issue: Drawing on approaches from intellectual and conceptual history as well as the sociology of science, they examine Liang Qichao’s early demand for statistics, attempts to quantify China’s Muslim population, Sun Yat-sen’s evolving obsession with the “400 million Chinese”, and the surprising wealth of statistical production in warlord-ruled Shanxi province. The authors ask why numbers, and statistical ones in particular, became so alluring and even fetishised, despite those involved in the production and use of the numbers being aware of their imprecision. Why did statistics become a sine qua non for governing China’s population? And how did specific numbers become central political terms? The authors also explore how numbers were used to construct arguments about China’s “population”, “society”, and “people” and how these arguments changed over time.
本專刊《近代中國人口的編碼與治理》聚焦二十世紀以來在量化中國人口方面的不懈努力。數字並非中立地反映客觀事實,而是產生於特定歷史背景、用以藏匿現實的密碼。本專刊收錄的四篇論文綜合運用思想史、概念史以及科學社會學的研究方法,分別探討了梁啟超對統計的早期需求、中國穆斯林人口量化的初步嘗試、孫中山對“四萬萬中國人”的執著探究、以及軍閥統治下山西統計工作的驚人成就。並進一步探究了為什麼數位(尤其是統計資料)明明不精確,但時人仍為之癡迷?統計資料何以成為治理中國人口的必要條件?特定數位怎樣成為核心政治術語?統計資料如何被用以建構關於中國"人口"、"社會"及"人民"的論述以及這些論述的歷時性演變。
Downloads
References
Bréard, Andrea. 2008. Reform, Bureaucratic Expansion and Production of Numbers: Statis-tics in Early 20th Century China. Habilitationsschrift, Technische Universität Berlin.
———. 2019. “400 Millionen: Globale Wirkungen einer mächtigen Zahl”. In Die Zählung der Welt. Kulturgeschichte der Statistik vom 18. bis 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Stefan Haas, Michael C. Schneider, and Nicolas Bilo, 215–232. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
———. 2025a. “Introduction” (Focus: Global Life Histories of Numbers). Isis 116.1: 123–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/733986.
———. 2025b. “The (Local) Rise and (Global) Fall of the ‘Coefficient of Racial Likeness’.” Isis 116.1: 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1086/733983.
Blayo, Yves. 1997. Des politiques démographiques en Chine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France & Éditions de l’Institut National d’Études Démographique.
Daston, Lorraine (ed.). 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Desrosières, Alain. 1992. “Discuter l’indiscutable.” In Pouvoir et légitimité, edited by Alain Cottereau and Paul Ladrière, 131–154. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsehess.9775.
Gänger, Stefanie. 2025. “38°C: Fever, Thermometry, and the Coming into Being of a Global Norm, ca. 1868–1890.” Isis 116.1: 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/733980.
Ghosh, Arunabh. 2025. “Work Points in the People’s Republic of China, 1950s to the 1980s.” Isis 116.1: 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/734001.
Greenhalgh, Susan, and Edwin A. Winckler. 2005. Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1982. “Biopower and the Avalanche of Printed Numbers.” Humanities in So-ciety 5.3/4: 279–295.
Merry, Sally Engle, Kevin E. Davis, and Benedict Kingsbury (eds.). 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators. Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Mullaney, Thomas S. 2011. Coming to Terms with the Nation: Ethnic Classification and Scientific Statecraft in Modern China, 1928–1954. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: Uni-versity of California Press.
Nocchi, Jacopo. 2025. “Becoming the 1%: The Attractiveness and Sociopolitical Implications of Autism Prevalence as 1% in Mainland China.” Isis 116.1: 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1086/733989.
Patriarca, Silvana. 1996. Numbers and Nationhood: Writing Statistics in Nineteenth-Century Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paulès, Xavier. 2020. “Le petit âge d’or statistique de la décennie de Nankin (1928–1937).” In Encyclopédie des historiographies: Afriques, Amériques, Asies. Volume 1: sources et genres historiques, edited by Kouamé, Nathalie, Éric P. Meyer, and Anne Viguier, 1328–1334. Paris: Presses de l’Inalco. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesinalco.27790.
Vogelsang, Kai. 2012. “Chinese ‘Society’: History of a Troublesome Concept.” Oriens Extremus 51: 155–192.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andrea Bréard, Stefan Christ (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.