編碼與治理
近代中國的人口量化管理
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25365/jeacs.2025.6.1.ab-sc关键词:
量化，統計，近代中國，人口，社會摘要
本專刊《近代中國人口的編碼與治理》聚焦二十世紀以來在量化中國人口方面的不懈努力。數字並非中立地反映客觀事實，而是產生於特定歷史背景、用以藏匿現實的密碼。本專刊收錄的四篇論文綜合運用思想史、概念史以及科學社會學的研究方法，分別探討了梁啟超對統計的早期需求、中國穆斯林人口量化的初步嘗試、孫中山對“四萬萬中國人”的執著探究、以及軍閥統治下山西統計工作的驚人成就。並進一步探究了為什麼數位（尤其是統計資料）明明不精確，但時人仍為之癡迷？統計資料何以成為治理中國人口的必要條件？特定數位怎樣成為核心政治術語？統計資料如何被用以建構關於中國"人口"、"社會"及"人民"的論述以及這些論述的歷時性演變。
Downloads
参考
Bréard, Andrea. 2008. Reform, Bureaucratic Expansion and Production of Numbers: Statis-tics in Early 20th Century China. Habilitationsschrift, Technische Universität Berlin.
———. 2019. “400 Millionen: Globale Wirkungen einer mächtigen Zahl”. In Die Zählung der Welt. Kulturgeschichte der Statistik vom 18. bis 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Stefan Haas, Michael C. Schneider, and Nicolas Bilo, 215–232. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
———. 2025a. “Introduction” (Focus: Global Life Histories of Numbers). Isis 116.1: 123–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/733986.
———. 2025b. “The (Local) Rise and (Global) Fall of the ‘Coefficient of Racial Likeness’.” Isis 116.1: 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1086/733983.
Blayo, Yves. 1997. Des politiques démographiques en Chine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France & Éditions de l’Institut National d’Études Démographique.
Daston, Lorraine (ed.). 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Desrosières, Alain. 1992. “Discuter l’indiscutable.” In Pouvoir et légitimité, edited by Alain Cottereau and Paul Ladrière, 131–154. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsehess.9775.
Gänger, Stefanie. 2025. “38°C: Fever, Thermometry, and the Coming into Being of a Global Norm, ca. 1868–1890.” Isis 116.1: 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/733980.
Ghosh, Arunabh. 2025. “Work Points in the People’s Republic of China, 1950s to the 1980s.” Isis 116.1: 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/734001.
Greenhalgh, Susan, and Edwin A. Winckler. 2005. Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1982. “Biopower and the Avalanche of Printed Numbers.” Humanities in So-ciety 5.3/4: 279–295.
Merry, Sally Engle, Kevin E. Davis, and Benedict Kingsbury (eds.). 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators. Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Mullaney, Thomas S. 2011. Coming to Terms with the Nation: Ethnic Classification and Scientific Statecraft in Modern China, 1928–1954. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: Uni-versity of California Press.
Nocchi, Jacopo. 2025. “Becoming the 1%: The Attractiveness and Sociopolitical Implications of Autism Prevalence as 1% in Mainland China.” Isis 116.1: 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1086/733989.
Patriarca, Silvana. 1996. Numbers and Nationhood: Writing Statistics in Nineteenth-Century Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paulès, Xavier. 2020. “Le petit âge d’or statistique de la décennie de Nankin (1928–1937).” In Encyclopédie des historiographies: Afriques, Amériques, Asies. Volume 1: sources et genres historiques, edited by Kouamé, Nathalie, Éric P. Meyer, and Anne Viguier, 1328–1334. Paris: Presses de l’Inalco. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesinalco.27790.
Vogelsang, Kai. 2012. “Chinese ‘Society’: History of a Troublesome Concept.” Oriens Extremus 51: 155–192.
Downloads
已出版
How to Cite
期
栏目
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andrea Bréard, Stefan Christ (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
