互動與競爭

東漢《禮記》註文的比較研究

作者

  • Marco Pouget Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25365/jeacs.2024.5.pouget

关键词:

鄭玄, 禮記, 經典註釋, 思想話語, 東漢, 子

摘要

本研究聚焦於東漢時期不同經註之間的“脫節”現象。以鄭玄和盧植為例,本文通過比較分析發現,儘管當時存在思想互動的證據,但在他們的註釋中卻很少回應或討論同時期其他註釋家的觀點。同輩學者的觀點似乎被有意回避,這可能是為了在註釋中為個人見解的表達創造獨立的空間。值得註意的是,當時學術上的互動更多出現在非經註性質的作品而並非直接呈現於註釋文本之中。基於這一觀察,本文主張結合經註生成的歷史背景和學術脈絡,重新建構圍繞這一特定文本傳統的思想辯論。

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

参考

Primary Sources

Houhanshu 後漢書. 1965. Fan Ye 范曄 (comp.). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Liji zhengyi 禮記正義. Wuyingdian shisanjing zhushu 武英殿十三經註疏. 1739. Kong Yingda 孔穎達 (ed.).

Maoshi zhengyi 毛詩正義. Shisanjing zhushu zhengliben 十三經註疏整理本. 2000. Shisanjing zhushu weiyuanhui 十三經註疏委員會 (eds.). Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.

Shangshu zhengyi 尚書正義. Shisanjing zhushu zhengliben 十三經註疏整理本. 2000. Shisanjing zhu-shu weiyuanhui 十三經註疏委員會 (eds.). Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.

Shiji 史記. 1963. Sima Qian 司馬遷 and Sima Tan 司馬談. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Wenjingtang congshu 問經堂叢書. Baibu congshu jicheng 百部叢書集成. 1968. Yan Yiping 嚴一萍 (comp.). Taipei: Yiwen yinshuguan.

Wujing yiyi 五經異義 / Bo Wujing yiyi shuzheng 駁五經異義疏證. Zhongguo sixiangshi ziliao congkan 中國思想史資料叢刊. 2014. Chen Shouqi 陳壽祺 and Pi Xirui 皮錫瑞 (eds.). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Yuhan shanfang ji yishu 玉函山房輯佚書. 1990. Ma Guohan 馬國翰 (comp.). Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.

Zhengzhi 鄭志. Wenjingtang congshu 問經堂叢書. Baibu congshu jicheng 百部叢書集成. 1968. Yan Yiping 嚴一萍 (comp.). Taipei: Yiwen yinshuguan.

Zhouli zhengyi 周禮正義. Shisanjing zhushu zhengliben 十三經註疏整理本. 2000. Shisanjing zhushu weiyuanhui 十三經註疏委員會 (eds.). Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.

Secondary Sources

Bielenstein, Hans. 2008. The Bureaucracy of Han Times. Cambridge Studies in Chinese History, Literature, and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chen Yinke 陳寅恪. 1992. “Zhimindu xueshuo kao 支湣度學説考” [A Study of Zhimindu’s Scholar-ly Explanations]. In Chen Yinke shixue lunwen xuanji 陳寅恪史學論文選集. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.

Cheng, Anne. 2001. “What did it mean to be a Ru in Han times?”. Asia Major 14.2: 101–118.

Connery, Christopher Leigh. 1998. The Empire of the Text. Writing and Authority in Early Imperial China. Lanham/Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

Dull, Jack. 1966. A Historical Introduction to the Apocryphal (ch’an-wei) Texts of the Han Dynasty. PhD diss., University of Washington.

Elman, Benjamin. 1990. Classicism, Politics, and Kinship: The Ch’ang-chou School of New Text Con-fucianism in Late Imperial China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Elman, Benjamin and Martin Kern (eds.). 2010. Statecraft and Classical Learning: The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History. Studies in the History of Chinese Texts 1. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

Ess, Hans van. 1999. “The Apocryphal Texts of the Han Dynasty and the Old Text/New Text Con-troversy”. T’oung Pao 85: 29–64.

Giacinto, Licia di. 2013. The Chenwei Riddle: Time, Stars, and Heroes in the Apocrypha. Deutsche Ostasienstudien 31. Gossenberg: Ostasien Verlag.

Habberstad, Luke and Liu Yucai 劉玉才. 2014. “The Life of a Text: A Brief History of the Liji 禮記 (Rites Records) and Its Transmission.” Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture 1.1–2: 289‒308.

Henderson, John B. 1991. Scripture, Canon and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Honey, David B. 2021. Qin, Han, Wei, Jin: Canon and Commentary: A History of Classical Chinese Scholarship. Vol. II. Washington/London: Academica Press.

Hua Zhe 華喆. 2018. Li shi Zhengxue: Han-Tang jian jingdian quanshi bianqianshi lungao 禮是鄭學——漢唐閒經典詮釋變遷史論稿 [The Mores Canon Consists in Zheng Scholarship: A Preliminary Discussion of the Changing Development of Commenting on the Classics between Han and Tang]. Gudian yu wenming 古典與文明. Beijing: Sanlian shuju.

Ikeda Shuzo 池田秀三. 1990. “Ro Shoku to sono ‘Reiki kikou’ 盧植とその『禮記解詁』” [Lu Zhi and his Liji jiegu]. Kyoto daigaku bungakubu kenkyū kiyō 京都大學文學部研究紀要 29: 1‒36.

Ikeda Shuzo 池田秀三, Hung Chun-Yin 洪春音 (trans.). 2004. “Weishu Zhengshi xue yanjiu xushuo 緯書鄭氏學研究序說” [Preliminary Discussion of Research on the Scholarship of Apocryphal Writings by Mister Zheng]. Shumu jikan 書目季刊 37.4: 59‒78.

Kern, Martin. 2001. “Ritual, Text, and the Formation of the Canon. Historical Transitions of Wen in Early China.” T’oung Pao 87: 43‒91.

Lewis, Mark Edward. 1999. Writing and Authority in Early China. SUNY Series in Chinese Philoso-phy and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Liu Qiuzeng 劉秋增 and ‘Shandong sheng zhuzi mingjia zhi’ bianzuan weiyuanhui《山東省諸子名家志》編纂委員會 (eds.). 2003. Zheng Xuan zhi 鄭玄志 (Treatises on Zheng Xuan). Shandong shengzhi zhuzi mingjia xilie congshu 《山東省志》諸子名家系列叢書. Ji’nan: Shandong renmin chubanshe.

Luo, Jianwei 羅健蔚. 2015. Zheng Xuan huitong san “Li” yanjiu 鄭玄會通三《禮》研究 (Research of Zheng Xuan’s Reconciliation of the three ‘Li’). PhD diss., National Taiwan University. Airiti Li-brary (Huayi xianshang tushuguan 華藝綫上圖書館), DOI: 10.6342/NTU.2015.01732.

Lü Kai 呂凱. 1982. Zheng Xuan zhi chenweixue 鄭玄之讖緯學 [Zheng Xuan’s Study of Apocrypha]. Xiulu wenku 岫盧文庫 82. Taipei: Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.

Morgan, Daniel Patrick. 2022. “Calling out Zheng Xuan (127–200 CE) at the Crossroads of Ritual, Mathematics, Sport, and Classical Commentary”. In Mathematical Commentaries in the Ancient World. A Global Perspective, edited by Karine Chemla and Glenn Most, 141–196. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nylan, Michael. 1994. “The Chin wen/Ku wen Controversy in Han Times”. T’oung Pao 80: 83‒136.

Nylan, Michael. 2001. The Five “Confucian” Classics. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

Pi Xirui 皮錫瑞. 2021. Jingxue tonglun 經學通論 [Comprehensive Discussion of Classical Scholarship]. Zhongguo chuantong jingdian yu jieshi 中國傳統經典與解釋 (Classici et Commentarii) ‒ Qingren jingjie congbian 清人經解叢編. Beijing: Huaxia chubanshe.

Shaughnessy, Edward L. 1993. “I ching 易經”. In Early Chinese Texts: A Biographical Guide, edited by Michael Loewe, 216–228. Early China Special Monograph Series 2. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China and The Institute for East Asian Studies, University of California.

Shi Yingyong 史應勇. 2007. Zheng Xuan tongxue ji Zheng-Wang zhi zheng yanjiu 鄭玄通學及鄭王之爭研究 [Research on Zheng Xuan’s Comprehensive Scholarship and the Conflict between Zheng and Wang]. Chengdu: Ba-Shu shushe.

Wang Chenglüe 王承略. 2004. Zheng Xuan yu gu jin wen jingxue 鄭玄與古今文經學 [Zheng Xuan and the Classical Scholarship of Old and New Texts]. Qi Lu lishi wenhua congshu 齊魯歷史文化叢書. Ji’nan: Shandong wenyi chubanshe.

Wang Zhenmin 王振民. 1999. Zheng Xuan yanjiu wenji 鄭玄研究文集 [Collection of Research Writings on Zheng Xuan]. Weifang lishi wenhua mingren yanjiu congshu 濰坊歷史文化名人研究叢書. Ji’nan 濟南: Qi-Lu shushe.

Yang Tianyu 楊天宇. 2007. Zheng Xuan Sanli zhu yanjiu 鄭玄三禮註研究. Tianjin: Tianjin renmin chubanshe.

Yoshikawa Tadao 吉川忠夫, Jiang Xiaoliang 蔣曉亮 (trans.). 2019. “Zheng Xuan de xueshu 鄭玄的學塾” [Zheng Xuan’s Academy]. Wei-Jin Nanbeichao Sui Tang shi ziliao 魏晉南北朝隋唐史資料 40: 268‒293.

Zhao Houjun 趙厚均. 2008. “Liang Han jingxue zhong tongxue chansheng guocheng tanxi 兩漢經學中通學產生過程探析” [Exploration of the Emergence Process of Comprehensive Scholarship in Classical Scholarship of the Two Han Dynasties]. Yuandong tongshi xuebao 遠東通識學報 2.2: 19‒30.

Zhao Lu 趙璐. 2019. In Pursuit of the Great Peace: Han Dynasty Classicism and the Making of Early Medieval Literati Culture. SUNY Series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Albany: State Univer-sity of New York Press.

Zufferey, Nicolas. 1994. “Wang Chong et les Ru sous les Han. Problèmes de Terminologie et de Methode”. Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 48.4: 1403–1408.

Downloads

已出版

2024-12-23

How to Cite

Pouget, M. (2024). 互動與競爭: 東漢《禮記》註文的比較研究. The Journal of the European Association for Chinese Studies 歐洲漢學學會學刊, 5, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.25365/jeacs.2024.5.pouget

栏目

註釋與詮釋

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.