Welchen Raum braucht Geschichte?

Vorstellungen von Räumlichkeit in den Geschichts-, Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften

Autor/innen

  • Alexander Mejstrik Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Universität Wien

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25365/oezg-2006-17-1-2

Abstract

Spatial images and concepts as well as images and concepts of spatiality – in short: conceptions of space – are of double importance for the humanities. They are frequently used, and they have a strong impact on the content of the objects of research. There is, however, a lot of vagueness and even »confusion«, as Reinhart Koselleck put it, in these uses of conceptions of space. These ambiguities were and are often considered a problem. So far, attempts to solve this problem have been varying and combining encyclopedic, typological, and purely theoretical approaches. To avoid the flaws of these common solutions, the author suggests a conceptual tool which enables the researchers themselves to discuss conceptions of space in a scholarly/ scientifically reasonable way, i.e. in the course of their own research, and with regard to the conceptions’ potentials to rectify the very objects of research. Following a concept of Gaston Bachelard (The Philosophy of No), this tool can be sketched as an epistemological profile of conceptions of space.

Downloads

Zitationsvorschlag

Mejstrik, A. (2006). Welchen Raum braucht Geschichte? Vorstellungen von Räumlichkeit in den Geschichts-, Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, 17(1), 9–64. https://doi.org/10.25365/oezg-2006-17-1-2