Need an expert opinion?

Thoughts on the genesis of child psychiatric expertise

Authors

  • Lena Künzle Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich
  • Daniel Lis Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich
  • Sara Galle Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich
  • Emmanuel Neuhaus Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich
  • Iris Ritzmann kompass A, Zurich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25365/oezg-2020-31-3-7

Keywords:

social history, 20th century, child placement, Switzerland, history of medicine, history of psychiatry, psychiatric expertise, stigmatization

Abstract

From the 1920s, children in Switzerland were psychiatrically examined in observation wards. In many cases, these medical reports were linked to the placement of children in homes and foster families. Focusing on a specific case study of the observation institution Stephansburg in Zurich in 1944, this paper retraces the genesis of a child psychiatric report, identifying patterns by which the experts dealt with narratives of teachers, parents or school doctors. At a closer look, tests and medical examinations were not necessarily committed to a strictly scientific approach. The case study analysed in this paper indicates that experts in child psychiatry did not always apply expert knowledge when preparing their opinion. Rather, they resorted to a selection of aspects alien to psychiatry but suitable to satisfy the interests of the contracting authority.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-20

How to Cite

Künzle, L., Lis, D., Galle, S., Neuhaus, E., & Ritzmann, I. (2021). Need an expert opinion? Thoughts on the genesis of child psychiatric expertise. Austrian Journal of Historical Studies, 31(3), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.25365/oezg-2020-31-3-7